2/7/2024 0 Comments Kmsp xplane 11`![]() Their two New Zealand airports (NZAA and NZWN) aren’t particularly stable on Xbox, especially when you consider they contain a significant number of lower-res textures. I’ve always been lukewarm towards Flightbeam’s optimisation. Even worse, on Delta’s maintenance ramp there are the dismembered 2D horizontal stabs of several airliners sticking out from the edge of the concrete! This REALLY should have been addressed but, thankfully, it’s an area few virtual pilots will go diligently exploring. ![]() In one location there are flat 2D aircraft - presumably part of an outdoor museum collection - that really should have been erased altogether and replaced with grass if they didn’t feel up to the task of modelling them. The bad news is that, again, some of the ground textures in these areas are much lower-res and in places they’re downright poor. There are three static aircraft dotted about: two Hercs outside the national Guard facility and an old DC-9 used as a fire trainer. The terminal landside isn’t as impressive, with the roads and car-parks being of significantly lower resolution but I’d say they’ve done a slightly better job than FlyTampa or Drzewiecki do in these areas.Īway from the terminals all airside peripheral buildings and structures have been equally well modelled and there are far more of them than I expected. ![]() It’s all high-res, too! A feature I absolutely love is the airside road tunnel that goes under part of the terminal, near stand G4 - it’s incredibly well done! The apron itself features those wonderful reflective oil stains we’ve come to love about Flightbeam airports, and it hosts some really decent static clutter, custom-modelled specifically for this airport. There are no jagged curves in the taxiway and apron markings. Ground textures airside are simply fantastic and retain much of their detail when viewed from altitude. You can get inside but it’s a bit temperamental, and what’s to be seen isn’t particularly aesthetic once you’re in there. Some of the texturing is a little lower-res than I would have liked but it’s decent enough where it matters.ĭespite the marketing claims there’s no real interior to speak of - just a nice-looking vista from the cockpit of a parked airliner but that’s really all you need. So, does KMSP live up to the hype?įlightbeam have put the majority of their effort into making the terminal area look as realistic as possible and they’ve done a stellar job. They are certainly among the top five but the likes of IniBuilds and Pyreegue are, in my opinion, just as good and, in some respects, better. $19.Justifiably, Flightbeam have always received enormous praise for their incredibly realistic-looking airports however at times I feel they’re somewhat overhyped. You can buy it now from Contrail for 18.95 EUR (approx. Perhaps what is interesting to note is the new Flightbeam SoundFX, which is captured from real-life airports and placed around certain areas for a realistic effect. ![]() Flightbeam Gen-5 dynamic jetways and custom signage is also included, along with key interior modelling for various parts of the terminal. The product is developed with the latest features in mind, including 4K texturing, multi-layered and realistically painted ground textures, along new dense custom tarmac objects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |